40{"sid":"UpJsY2hMR8j46lv0A-SA"}42["messages","[{\"id\":\"942157086140268594\",\"timestamp\":1644698153768,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"The lawyer for trump on the YouTube case is a big name lawyer. Won the big tobacco cases in the 90s.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942158719637139517\",\"timestamp\":1644698543224,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"mildconcern\",\"content\":\"mostly retired now though right?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942158742521278505\",\"timestamp\":1644698548680,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"mildconcern\",\"content\":\"or am I getting them mixed up?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942222377885007932\",\"timestamp\":1644713720533,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"yeah, mostly. also was a big democratic supporter, but went maga\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942450118420992060\",\"timestamp\":1644768018108,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"BentFranklin\",\"content\":\"Statement by Josh Renaud about Missouri investigation\\nhttps://joshrenaud.com/pd/josh-renaud-personal-statement.pdf\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942943900740497428\",\"timestamp\":1644885744987,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"> First, Section 230 has no application here because Meta is not being sued for being a passive\\n> “provider” of a platform, but rather for playing a direct and active role in commissioning, jointly\\n> developing, and then amplifying speech defaming Stossel.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942943982340689920\",\"timestamp\":1644885764442,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Why did nobody inform me that Stossel's idiot legal team had responded?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942944156660170762\",\"timestamp\":1644885806003,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60415705/49/stossel-v-meta-platforms-inc/\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"link\",\"url\":\"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60415705/49/stossel-v-meta-platforms-inc/\"}]},{\"id\":\"942944283323953233\",\"timestamp\":1644885836202,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"For those confused by the docket structure, the reason is that he's also suing the fact checkers.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"942944349971435541\",\"timestamp\":1644885852092,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"And *they* just filed their motion to dismiss and strike via anti-SLAPP as well.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943089569061011516\",\"timestamp\":1644920475021,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Seriously, <@John Roddy>, where would the Techdirt insider chat be without you?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943343683388993566\",\"timestamp\":1644981060598,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"> OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO THE MOTION AND MEMORANDUM OF LAW BY INTERVENOR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF 47 U.S.C. § 230(C)\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943343740708352011\",\"timestamp\":1644981074264,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Holy hell\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943349502738329682\",\"timestamp\":1644982448039,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Cathy Gellis\",\"content\":\"What is this?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943350580473106452\",\"timestamp\":1644982704991,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60643878/145/trump-v-youtube-llc/\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"article\",\"url\":\"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/60643878/145/trump-v-youtube-llc/\"}]},{\"id\":\"943350655207243836\",\"timestamp\":1644982722809,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"A fairly straightforward administrative motion, all things considered.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943350743283425330\",\"timestamp\":1644982743808,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"But good lord is it a mouthfull.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943351063254270022\",\"timestamp\":1644982820095,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Cathy Gellis\",\"content\":\"Ugh, yes.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943351216740663306\",\"timestamp\":1644982856689,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Cathy Gellis\",\"content\":\"I was specifically taught that a caption is an opportunity for advocacy, and I don't think these lawyers availed themselves of that opportunity (although I'm not sure what they could have said instead necessarily).\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943360129678602251\",\"timestamp\":1644984981699,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Part of me is really hoping that Trump's lawyers try to file an opposition to this opposition.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943360203804540938\",\"timestamp\":1644984999372,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Just to see how far the title can stretch before it collapses into a black hole.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943367374650888243\",\"timestamp\":1644986709035,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"brian willen is one of the best litigators out there. if that's what he went with i'll assume that's the best there is\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943381445634850816\",\"timestamp\":1644990063819,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Well, the actual title that the PDF ended up with is...less elegant.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943382054819758080\",\"timestamp\":1644990209060,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Cathy Gellis\",\"content\":\"I like Brian. But I'm not sure how much this was specifically his brief...\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943382878790758442\",\"timestamp\":1644990405510,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"https://twitter.com/riScorpian/status/1493824097381404674?t=a-Ji_EiGdnxaXFkJ03V3Eg&s=19\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"rich\",\"url\":\"https://twitter.com/riScorpian/status/1493824097381404674?t=a-Ji_EiGdnxaXFkJ03V3Eg&s=19\"}]},{\"id\":\"943383062794862592\",\"timestamp\":1644990449380,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"That was from the Stossel filing, but this one had the same quirk.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943383605839818752\",\"timestamp\":1644990578852,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Cathy Gellis\",\"content\":\"Is that a PDF issue, or an ECF issue?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943389603329634334\",\"timestamp\":1644992008765,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I can't tell.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943389696204111872\",\"timestamp\":1644992030908,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"It doesn't show up on the same PDF when viewed on my phone.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943389815750148116\",\"timestamp\":1644992059410,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"But Firefox's built-in reader does display it.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943389911690670141\",\"timestamp\":1644992082284,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"And it's only from Twitter's filings specifically in these two cases.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943389962563375124\",\"timestamp\":1644992094413,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"The rest don't seem to have a title at all.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"943979724248608808\",\"timestamp\":1645132704556,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"katana\",\"content\":\"\\\"We’re excited to announce that Straight Talk is now a part of the Verizon family.\\\" Oh frabjous day. Callooh. Callay.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944044018977878057\",\"timestamp\":1645148033614,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"I take it you're gyring and gimbling in your wabe.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944045984411971614\",\"timestamp\":1645148502210,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"I have something to confess\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944046037256007701\",\"timestamp\":1645148514809,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"I think the 2018 Music Modernization Act was a very good law.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944046122094194748\",\"timestamp\":1645148535036,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"The more I look at it, the more I like about it.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944046298020081734\",\"timestamp\":1645148576980,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"I'm just surprised that Brewster Kahle, whom I deeply respect, called it \\\"dreadful\\\".\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944046444132859944\",\"timestamp\":1645148611816,\"modified\":1645148628690,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"I don't see anything dreadful about it, at least not in its passed form…\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944048778376257576\",\"timestamp\":1645149168343,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"the final version turned out *decent*. it could have been much better, but earlier versions really were dreadful.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944048876984336385\",\"timestamp\":1645149191853,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I was rather pleased to see Ron Wyden find a way to make orphan works actually make sense.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944048890460639272\",\"timestamp\":1645149195066,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"you have ron wyden to thank for saving it. he had enough pull to basically say \\\"fix this or the whole bill dies\\\"\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944048913894211676\",\"timestamp\":1645149200653,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Ah\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049012196134913\",\"timestamp\":1645149224090,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"How bad were the earlier versions, if you don't mind me asking?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049072929669192\",\"timestamp\":1645149238570,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"The law as a whole did a lot of good work to cleanup some lingering headaches with copyright law.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049129867313163\",\"timestamp\":1645149252145,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Fortunately, there are still plenty remaining...\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049370356137995\",\"timestamp\":1645149309482,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"I do remember that no audio recording would expire until 2067 in earlier drafts\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049453109768262\",\"timestamp\":1645149329212,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Wyden's fix mostly repaired the damage from the pure-power-grab that was \\\"CLASSICS.\\\"\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049584605368340\",\"timestamp\":1645149360563,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"That was the schedule for when song recordings' © expires, right?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049654415388742\",\"timestamp\":1645149377207,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Not quite.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049784887578644\",\"timestamp\":1645149408314,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I believe it was more about how recordings previously handled by state-level copyright would be treated at the federal level from now on.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944049875383902269\",\"timestamp\":1645149429890,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"What did the earlier drafts say?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944050154409955378\",\"timestamp\":1645149496415,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I don't remember the specifics off the top of my head, but it did result in more or less just giving everything to the record labels and yelling JOB WELL DONE if any further questions came along.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944050180288835704\",\"timestamp\":1645149502585,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"ah\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944050206742310982\",\"timestamp\":1645149508892,\"modified\":1645149512103,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Yeah, that would bite\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944050359473700914\",\"timestamp\":1645149545306,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180917/17305440659/compromise-music-modernization-act-will-bring-old-sound-recordings-into-public-domain-tiptoe-towards-orphan-works-solution.shtml\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"link\",\"url\":\"https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20180917/17305440659/compromise-music-modernization-act-will-bring-old-sound-recordings-into-public-domain-tiptoe-towards-orphan-works-solution.shtml\"}]},{\"id\":\"944050676630159430\",\"timestamp\":1645149620922,\"modified\":1645149626582,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Anyway, I'm just glad that\\nA. there's a reasonable schedule for when audio recordings would expire, and \\nB. I no longer have to pay for a mechanical license when I upload ©ed cover songs to my music distributor.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944050811900661840\",\"timestamp\":1645149653173,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"The irritating thing about orphan works is that you kinda just have to assume anything otherwise obviously in the public domain is protected by copyright unless you can find specific proof stating otherwise.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944051005300047943\",\"timestamp\":1645149699283,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"This implementation opted to define an entire category of what could be considered orphan works, but then set off a countdown clock for the window to claim them.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944051552786735174\",\"timestamp\":1645149829814,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"But in the end, MMA was Congress patting themselves on the back for successfully fixing a pothole by dropping a piece of plywood over it.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944051769518981120\",\"timestamp\":1645149881487,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"lol\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944051803266379848\",\"timestamp\":1645149889533,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"It's an improvement over what Copyright law looked like before, but that's pretty much the only context that makes it look good.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944051932710993950\",\"timestamp\":1645149920395,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Well, an improvement of _anything_ by Congress in 2018 should be a miracle\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052178203598849\",\"timestamp\":1645149978925,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Wake me up when someone at least *tries* to reintroduce SPEAK-FREE.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052319740379137\",\"timestamp\":1645150012670,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"What's \\\"SPEAK-FREE\\\"?\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052373687521280\",\"timestamp\":1645150025532,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Sounds like a shitty piece of legislation\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052387377713214\",\"timestamp\":1645150028796,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Federal anti-SLAPP law.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052398844960789\",\"timestamp\":1645150031530,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"ah\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052459263897650\",\"timestamp\":1645150045935,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"And it's an even more contrived acronym than SPEECH.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052528381845574\",\"timestamp\":1645150062414,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"But also like SPEECH, a very *very* good law.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052590352666655\",\"timestamp\":1645150077189,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Something tells me it would be watered down in either chamber of Congress\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052736801005630\",\"timestamp\":1645150112105,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Anti-SLAPP laws are still one of the very few things to get broad bipartisan support.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944052886130786344\",\"timestamp\":1645150147708,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Even the 2019 attempt to wipe out the Texas anti-SLAPP law ended up barely changing it.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053156004917259\",\"timestamp\":1645150212051,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I watched some of the discussion from the 2016 committee hearing on SPEAK-FREE too.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053281808867398\",\"timestamp\":1645150242045,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"It was rather refreshing to see congresscritters engage in good-faith discussion that addresses real issues.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053309159915601\",\"timestamp\":1645150248566,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"Wow.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053367825662012\",\"timestamp\":1645150262553,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Like the mechanism for removing defamation lawsuits to federal court.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053371583758388\",\"timestamp\":1645150263449,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"This is one of those instance where I'm glad to have been proven wrong!\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053456535162951\",\"timestamp\":1645150283703,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"That's one of the aspects where I understand its purpose, but I can absolutely see why it's problematic as well.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053605399400498\",\"timestamp\":1645150319195,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Unfortunately, it just kinda died.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053635472560128\",\"timestamp\":1645150326365,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Samuel Abram\",\"content\":\"😢\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053654154002492\",\"timestamp\":1645150330819,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Not because it was being blocked or anything.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944053705039298570\",\"timestamp\":1645150342951,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"It just never got the traction it needed to get out of committee.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944094839912407060\",\"timestamp\":1645160150269,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"i may have seen some elements of what is likely to be proposed in the next federal anti-slapp attempt and... it's better than nothing, but is not a perfect solution\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944094958082723841\",\"timestamp\":1645160178443,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"there are plaintiffs lawyers who really really hate anti-slapp laws, and they have a decently powerful lobby\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944279234325651557\",\"timestamp\":1645204113323,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Timothy Geigner\",\"content\":\"https://tenor.com/view/i-cant-breathe-in-this-thing-dark-helmet-spaceballs-hard-to-breathe-suffocating-gif-24854407\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"gifv\",\"url\":\"https://tenor.com/view/i-cant-breathe-in-this-thing-dark-helmet-spaceballs-hard-to-breathe-suffocating-gif-24854407\"}]},{\"id\":\"944279252377927680\",\"timestamp\":1645204117627,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Timothy Geigner\",\"content\":\"Finally found my old avatar for Discord 🙂\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944331779609882634\",\"timestamp\":1645216641095,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I remember seeing that one of the driving factors in the last attempt to kneecap the Texas anti-SLAPP law was actually a consequence of Texas court procedure specifically.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944331915866013826\",\"timestamp\":1645216673581,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Namely the fact that there really wasn't a good equivalent of a 12(b)(6) MTD at the state level.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944332096527273984\",\"timestamp\":1645216716654,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"So there was a big log of case law from defense lawyers going to pretty stretchy extremes to try using the anti-SLAPP motion instead.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944332297929379850\",\"timestamp\":1645216764672,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"But I think that oddity for resolved.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944388815634726942\",\"timestamp\":1645230239543,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"> Consent MOTION to File Amicus Curiae Brief in Support of Twitter's Motion for De Novo Determination of Dispositive Matter Referred to Magistrate Judge filed by ACLU Foundation of Northern California, Electronic Frontier Foundation.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944388883725025370\",\"timestamp\":1645230255777,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Well hello there.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944389022048997396\",\"timestamp\":1645230288756,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/copyright-not-shortcut-around-constitutions-anonymous-speech-protections-eff-tells\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"article\",\"url\":\"https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2022/02/copyright-not-shortcut-around-constitutions-anonymous-speech-protections-eff-tells\"}]},{\"id\":\"944389115548405790\",\"timestamp\":1645230311048,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"I didn't even notice this until I checked the court's RSS feed.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944409665725419581\",\"timestamp\":1645235210592,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"Mike Masnick\",\"content\":\"ah nice.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944593159390892102\",\"timestamp\":1645278958891,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"*cocks shotgun*\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944593168312188988\",\"timestamp\":1645278961018,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/41956951/45/ginsberg-v-google-inc/\",\"embeds\":[{\"type\":\"link\",\"url\":\"https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/41956951/45/ginsberg-v-google-inc/\"}]},{\"id\":\"944593837953789972\",\"timestamp\":1645279120673,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"Almost every single time the court dismisses one of these bogus cases, they leave *some* kind of permission to amend.\",\"embeds\":[]},{\"id\":\"944593948524044288\",\"timestamp\":1645279147035,\"modified\":0,\"handle\":\"John Roddy\",\"content\":\"This time, they went out of their way to dedicate an entire page to explaining why they weren't going to do that.\",\"embeds\":[]}]"]